Search for: "People v. Knight" Results 381 - 400 of 647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
 The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed an amicus curiae brief with the US Supreme Court in Moody v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
In the emails, [Thompson] used the names Earl Thompson, Mystery Knight, Knights Elite, Saucy Jack, Black Jack, and Jack Porns. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
The people in these Italian mountain communities put NO food garbage into their dumps! [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 The Knight First Amendment Institute posted a blog discussing the amicus brief it filed in Twitter v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Knight v Goulandris itself, and the cases there referred to, amount to highly persuasive authority at Court of Appeal level for construing section 160 as being permissive. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:20 am
The England v Kenya cricket game is about to begin. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 118–19 (2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]