Search for: "People v. LaCrosse" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2009, 7:59 am
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:01 pm
As I noted Monday, several new filings in the lacrosse case have come in, all dealing with the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm by KC Johnson
The Court declined to hear the appeal of a case called Martin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:37 pm
It is something to think about.We can't sign off without commenting briefly on the US Supreme Court's decision in Bowles v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:31 am
Duke lacrosse case an exception here.Perception generally trumps reality--facts won't carry day in the media.Always going to be a villain in every crisis--Nifong becomes the villain.General pattern over last generation--decline of objective news; news as entertainment increasingly. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by KC Johnson
For instance, the brief points to a 5thCircuit case, Hand v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:17 am by David Lat
As a deeply self-loathing Asian-American, I do not support Asians shooting white people. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
The Evil Spirits of the Modern Daily Press (Puck Magazine 1888)On October 18, 2018, I participated in a presentation entitled “Free Speech and Originalist Jurisprudence” at the University of Wisconsin-Stout along with Professor Alan Bigel (UW-Lacrosse). [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by KC Johnson
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:45 pm
People believe what I say as an analyst. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Most people would consider this sort of hate crime to be a horrific act. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Navratilova even participated as one of the plaintiffs in the ACLU/Lambda Legal lawsuit challenging a 1992 anti-gay Colorado ballot initiative that ultimately resulted in the landmark Romer v. [read post]