Search for: "People v. Label" Results 81 - 100 of 4,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
  We routinely charge people with first-degree murder in cases in which we in fact end up getting a conviction under the felony murder doctrine. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:13 pm
Reg. 3922 (Jan. 24, 2006); Larkin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
As was recognized in Thompson v Utah, labels are not particularly helpful in this area of constitutional analysis, since changes affecting the penalty for or the substance of a crime may easily be disguised as procedural enactments. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
Some drugs have absolutely horrific side effects, including death, but since they work for the vast majority of people, they’re on the market, and appropriately labeled. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 1:26 pm
  Or do we disproportionately label events "tragic" when we think a large number of people (e.g., nonlawyers) might be reading the opinion? [read post]