Search for: "People v. Land"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 12:00 am
Several people have wondered whether the change in presidential administrations may alter the federal government's position supporting the State of Hawaii in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:47 am
As the Supreme Court oral argument in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Read the decision at: Associated Developers Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(See, e.g., Waikiki Marketplace Investment Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm
Landing Pages v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
After tracing Anglo-American views of Native land rights to their European roots, Watson explains how speculative ventures in Native lands affected not only Indian peoples themselves but the causes and outcomes of the French and Indian War, the American Revolution, and ratification of the Articles of Confederation. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:30 am
Jean Stefancic , University of Alabama School of Law, has posted Terrace v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:33 am
It did not matter that a wider pool of people used the land than originally anticipated when allocated for recreational use. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
From 1998 to 2004, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM or the Agency) conducted a large-scale land management planning process for federal fluid minerals development in Sierra and Otero Counties, where the Mesa is located. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:59 am
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has been instrumental in defining legal rights and obligations pertaining to Indian lands since its first path-making decision in the field in Johnson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 12:03 pm
Just because you're evading the police on your own piece of land -- driving like a bat out of hell thereupon -- doesn't mean you're not guilty of evading the police.So holds the Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
Aboriginal peoples in the province of British Columbia can stake a broad claim to their traditional territories due to a landmark victory at the Supreme Court of Canada, a decision that natural resource companies had warned would create investor uncertainty.Today’s ruling marked the first time the Supreme Court has recognized aboriginal title to a specific piece of land, and is expected to have predominant application in resource-rich Pacific Coast province, where there are… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
KF8215.75 .R69 2018 Royster, Judith V. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
(People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am
Hunter's headline speaks volumes, "Food security v energy security: land use conflict and the law. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:33 am
It did not matter that a wider pool of people used the land than originally anticipated when allocated for recreational use. [read post]
