Search for: "People v. Land (1994)" Results 81 - 100 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In other words, he considered that “minimum interference” option which forms the third stage of Lord Clyde’s threefold analysis in  de Freitas v  Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, Lands and Housing (1998)  had no part to play in this case. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
“…it is noted that either owner may cut back any branches or roots that grow over or under his land which interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of his land – even if that would result in injury to the tree. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
Applying some of these important discoveries to people, evolutionary biologists, economists and psychologists agree that people cooperate only if it is in their long-term self-interest. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm by Cody Poplin
It’s a question that for most people exists more in theory than in practice. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Since 1994, there have been no cases in which the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause has been dispositive. [read post]