Search for: "People v. Larry" Results 1 - 20 of 937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 10:17 am
On September 27, Kozinski's Favorite Flicks offers the 1996 biopic The People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
"Proof, I guess, that people in San Diego know how to have a good time. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:26 am
  Or the conflict with the Chelsea v Liverpool match? [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Larry Weinstein of Proskauer Rose LLP kindly answered my interview questions, which I have edited to add a few links and a picture. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 1:15 pm
This one wouldn't have received nearly as much attention had it been published prior to the Larry Craig scandal. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:12 am by Walter Olson
Neither Stephen Bainbridge nor Larry Ribstein is particularly impressed by it. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 5:00 pm by Beth Simone Noveck
  Nominally, a speech about the computer industry after GPL v. 3, it was, in fact, a disquisition about freedom and the opportunity to transform law into a collaborative act of creative people. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
 He argues that just as the Court accepted in Printz and New York v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:30 pm by Joe Mullin
Google GC Kent Walker: "People are treating patents like lottery tickets" Q: What does the Oracle v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:40 am by Sarah Riley Howard
On March 22, 2011, the Court of Appeals approved for publication an opinion originally released on February 1 in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:12 pm by Legal Talk Network
On this Ringler Radio podcast, host Larry Cohen joins colleague,  Mike Casey  and one of the original five Ringler Associates, Cecil Mathews, as they discuss  the structured settlement industry and how far they have come, share some personal stories about the people they have met along the way and pay tribute to David V. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:03 pm by David Lat
[Instapundit] * If the justice(s) Trump appoints to SCOTUS end up overturning Roe v. [read post]