Search for: "People v. Larson" Results 81 - 99 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 5:00 am by Susan Brenner
App. 415, 166 P.3d 554 (2007) and People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
To most people, this might seem a bit unusual but the law provides that personal acts like going to the bathroom or going to the break room are generally considered to be “in the course of" employment and are considered a normal part of expected "personal comfort" necessary for regular employment.The Appellate Court in Circuit City v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
To most people, this might seem a bit unusual but the law provides that personal acts like going to the bathroom or going to the break room are generally considered to be “in the course of" employment and are considered a normal part of expected "personal comfort" necessary for regular employment.The Appellate Court in Circuit City v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:39 pm
Since our appellate courts have held that the surcharge is "punishment", People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The Administration had an opportunity to negotiate and submit to Congress for approval an agreement that would have ensured that the benefits of trade flow broadly to working people, small farmers and society at large, as well as to larger businesses. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 7:46 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:27 am
The spending power also enters the picture: US v. [read post]