Search for: "People v. Laws (1981)" Results 21 - 40 of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 9:49 am by William Weinberg
Known as a “Watson Murder” charge, this crime gets its name from a California Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
(Race Discrimination; Section 1981; Peyote) Conway v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:07 pm by Tobin Admin
  The post Vehicles v Pedestrians appeared first on Tobin Injury Law. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:45 am
App. 1981) (speeding and odor of alcohol beverage); People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Murphy, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) (Revisited) and Other Topics: The Seventy-Third Session of the International Law Commission International DecisionsJaemin Lee, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the event Defendant should wish to seek reclassification or to be relieved of any further duty to register under Correction Law § 168-o there apparently exists no record to permit adequate judicial review as held in People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: Is declining to print a Pride poster unlawful? [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
The test In A v BBC the Supreme Court refused to lift an s.11 Contempt of Court Act 1981 order preventing the identification of a convicted foreign national sex offender, who had been anonymised in the context of immigration proceedings. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Stephen Bilkis
Relying on People v Bouyea, the People argue that it would be "futile and pointless" to have defendant reappear before this court for the filing of a non-defective predicate felony statement and resentencing since defendant had notice of all of his prior convictions. [read post]
It is important to note from the outset that, pursuant to section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, reporting restrictions apply regarding the publication of certain facts surrounding R v Jogee, however, this does not extend to academic discussion or law reporting of the Court’s judgment. [read post]