Search for: "People v. Laws (1981)" Results 61 - 80 of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
The test In A v BBC the Supreme Court refused to lift a Contempt of Court Act 1981, s 11 order preventing the identification of a convicted foreign national sex offender, who had been anonymised in the context of immigration proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
In cases stemming from Michigan’s 1981 Poletown Neighborhood Council v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
The present judgment therefore allowed the Supreme Court to hold that the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Parvaz Akhtar [1981] QB 46 and Bibi v ECO (Dhaka) [2007] EWCA Civ 740 were wrongly decided. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:02 pm
Relying on People v Bouyea, the People argue that it would be "futile and pointless" to have defendant reappear before this court for the filing of a non-defective predicate felony statement and resentencing since defendant had notice of all of his prior convictions. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
Our standard for judging whether a verdict is legally repugnant was articulated in 1981 in People v Tucker (55 NY2d 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am by INFORRM
  The test is not how many people in fact accessed the photograph but how many relevant persons might have. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Sometime in 1981, the defendants entered into a one-year written lease, effective 1 March 1981, with the original owner. [read post]