Search for: "People v. Le Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
As someone who has moved jobs a number of times and hired a fair number of people, I know I may take for granted this part of the career advancement process. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
His disappointments grounded not in the annoyance of ideological systems producing good for the common people; it is rather the reverse, the sense of betrayal around an ideology the greatest success of which was its text. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
The Court of Appeal has granted permission to appeal. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
RIAs or managers filing as exempt reporting advisers (“ERAs”) with the SEC or a state securities authority must file an annual amendment to their Form ADV within 90 days of the end of their fiscal year. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Canada On 17 October 2023, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador granted permission to amend the statement of defence in the case of Way v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
As to defamation, the leading case is the Irish case of Le Fanu v Malcolmson [1843-60] All ER Rep 152, (1848) 1 HLC 637, (1848) 9 ER 910, [1848] EngR 663 (27 June 1848) (pdf). [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
“les bases mêmes de la Communautė”; Simmenthal, para. 18), “the very essence of Union law” (fr. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Here's the decision, which I'll explain briefly: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23977262-23-09-13-order-on-motion-to-dismiss-le-figaro-et-al-v-apple: Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
One commentator observed, “why did many apparently intelligent people get into a tizzy on the basis of the headline rather than what the Bishop actually said? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
The tribunal of first instance granted most of his claim in 2013. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:27 am
Haas v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The TV presenter and naturalist Chris Packham sued the Editor of Country Squire Magazine over three allegations published on its website which alleged, among other things, that he had misled people in order to raise money for a tiger rescue charity. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
Ctr., Ltd., 276 AD2d 629 [2d Dept 2000] [“Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting” respondent’s untimely buyout election]; and Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., 262 AD2d 194 [1st Dept 1999] [“Agostini, owner of half the shares in the subject corporation, failed to exercise her right of election within the 90-day period . . . thus leaving the issue of whether to treat her election as timely within the motion court’s… [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
That is, it represents the construction of a well curated space where producers and consumers of solicited data (information, opinions, 'facts', etc.) can be contained within a space from which it can be used both by the platform manager (the UN special procedures, in this case), and those others who might be granted access to some to all of the data (in this case for the general public as posted to the Working Group space on the UN-Geneva website). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. [read post]
