Search for: "People v. Leahy" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s per curiam order in Allaithi v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Jodie Liu
See our summary of the bill from a couple weeks ago for a detailed account and a comparison to the previous Senate bill proposed by Senator Leahy nearly a year ago. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm by Josh Blackman
The Constitution grants the President certain powers, privileges, and immunities, that regular people lack. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:11 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
” The Leahy-Tillis Letter The Notice also cites the September 9, 2021 letter from Senators Leahy and Tillis to Mr. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm by Jodie Liu
  National Security Letter Program Reforms Title V of the new House bill reforms the FBI’s national security letter program in similar fashion as the Leahy bill did. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:05 pm by admin
Leahy, 8 Cal.4th at 607, 34 Cal.Rptr.2d 663, 882 P.2d 321.12 However, because a published California appellate decision has held that HGN testing is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community, see People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
  Here is the piece: Last week’s unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm
“I’m worried about people having that perception. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Lovechilde
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm by Lovechilde
Brett Kavanaugh was hand-picked by the Federalist Society to provide a fifth vote on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. [read post]