Search for: "People v. Leeds"
Results 41 - 60
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2018, 12:53 pm
In 1834, the Supreme Court in Wheaton v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:29 pm
It’s a game of two halves Four games into my local Man v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:00 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm
People are fucked. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
The internal dimension is the inherent capacity which people have—this will vary amongst populations. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm
v=7W33HRc1A6c [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:16 pm
Also amazing: almost half of people who buy counterfeits end up buying the real thing. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 7:06 am
Supreme Court issued a ruling in Matal v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:00 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
The prize -- to remind readers -- is complimentary registration, complete with a free lunch, at CLT's conference this Wednesday, 29 October, "Intellectual Property: the 'no patents' round-up for non-techie people", organised by CLT and held in Central London [it's still not too late to sign up for this joyous event, even if you're not the winner of this competition ...].The pain. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
Art, Music and Copyright Rap lyrics have been referenced in multiple reports of the sentencing of Dylan McEwan, a 19-year-old from Leeds who plead guilty to burglary and car theft charges at Leeds Crown Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926, which was handed down on the same day. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
Kevin Washburn Robert Williams Bill Wood Category 4 — Groups (aka Miscellaneous) 1491s Authors of law review articles on Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am
This point was clearly recognised in Campbell v MGN Ltd: as Lord Hoffmann said, it is about ‘the right to control dissemination of information about one’s private life and the right to the esteem and respect of other people’. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
An ICO investigation, prompted by complaints from the public, found the firm made repeated nuisance calls to people about PPI. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
