Search for: "People v. Leeds" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Professor Stein also facilitated a discussion on positive images of people with disabilities. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
In the courts: Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) v The Charity Commission for England and Wales, CA/2010/0007, (26 April 2011) Catholic Care loses appeal against refusal of permission to amend charitable objects to not offer adoption to same sex couples. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 6:43 am by Shari Shapiro
  The claims alleged by Gifford are really claims rightfully brought by people who have been harmed by spending too much on LEED buildings, or LEED accreditation. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm by Charon QC
(David Allen Green in his Jack of Kent blog explains the reference to Pressdram v Arkell if you are not aware of the meaning.) [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:14 pm by legalinformatics
Subhajit Basu of the University of Leeds School of Law, and Joe Duffy of Queen’s University of Belfast, have published Providing affordable, accessible legal information and advice for older people: As much a question of accessibility as affordability, European Journal of Law and Technology, v. 1, no. 3 (2010). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell,  Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:40 am by Chris Cheatham
  The plaintiffs goal is to convince the judge that a class or classes of people should be certified in the lawsuit. [read post]