Search for: "People v. Levell (1988)"
Results 1 - 20
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
At the national level, also super-learned Mr Justice Arnold said [in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL, at para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act." [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:27 am
It must therefore be assumed that people of modest means are not excluded from benefitting from Nuffield Health’s activities overall, even if they are excluded from the facilities at Merton Abbey gym. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
Brattain, 44 Cal. 3d 474, 479 (1988); Haraguchi v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
SB Diversified Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
These people know how to live. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In Steinhouse v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
In Steinhouse v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:49 am
This case (R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063) resulted in the Computer Misuse Act 1990. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:40 am
The Court cited the divergence of the New Mexico Courts from the 1988 U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:31 am
As long as the work originates from the author and contains a certain level of originality. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
Flynt, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), the Court held that IIED suits by public figures had to satisfy the protective actual malice standard of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:46 pm
Flint, 520 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 1988) (finding that multiple floor levels in dimly lit and overcrowded room is not an inherently dangerous condition); Bowles v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:30 am
The decision effectively eliminates any claims from employees who were exposed to noise levels between 85 and 90 dB(A) between 1 January 1978 and 1 January 1990. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), nor Edmond v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Board of Education, Cooper v. [read post]
