Search for: "People v. Lilly" Results 41 - 60 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am by Jason Rantanen
[v] In the sample, there were 16,739 unique word stems in the first claims of the 1905 non-provisionals. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am by Victoria Kwan
“That’s why I read the Lilly Ledbetter dissent from the bench. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”·         Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”·         Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India·         Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
www.colefrieman.com January 4, 2016 Clients, Friends, Associates:While the holiday season is a cause for celebration and reflection, it is also the busiest time of the year for most investment managers. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:41 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Links: Sunday’s article by Lilly Fowler, earlier post with briefs Excerpt: The location where the cases are litigated will prove crucial. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm by Joy Waltemath
A white sales rep allegedly complained to the CEO that the employee should not have been hired because “black people did not buy mopeds and ATVs” and that “black people do not ride ATV’s [and] do not come to shows. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Texas in the end”; and Lisa Soronen, who at the NCSL Blog notes that the case “is about different things for different people. [read post]