Search for: "People v. Lilly"
Results 141 - 160
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania case is Wisniewski v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:13 pm
The Pennsylvania case is Kristufek v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
His apparent feminist awakening didn’t happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It’s Hard to Measure https://t.co/phkXQiT7kE via @itifdc -> No expectation of privacy in subscriber information, R. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
In those two cases, none of the patent-holders contributed anything to the economic development of the highly profitable products that were created by thousands of other people and the amount of money demanded as damages in those two cases bore no reasonable relationship to the inventor's alleged contribution to those products.The Eolas and Blackberry cases are prime evidence of patent law run wild - a development which has not escaped the notice of the US Supreme Court, whose decision… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 29, 2009)Remanding bench verdict against 56yo rejected applicant's age discrim claim; District Court failed to evaluate statement preferring "younger educated people" as possible direct evidence>11th Circuit>> Birdyshaw v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 4:54 am
Lilly v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
Recall notice: Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Lilly, No. 06-2613 Denial of an inmate's habeas petition based upon ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed where there was sufficient evidence for a jury to have convicted defendant, and therefore no prejudice to defendant resulted from heeding his attorney's advice to waive a jury trial. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Shortly thereafter, plaintiff discontinued this action against Benyaminova and did not pursue default judgments against co-defendants Skazka III, Inc., Kids Kingdom, Losyev, and Lilly Godzhinsky. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
http://tinyurl.com/2ebwzx5 Eli Lilly Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:44 am
See, e.g., Teamsters v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
[v] In the sample, there were 16,739 unique word stems in the first claims of the 1905 non-provisionals. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:06 am
Lilly. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
The IPKat isn't flying over for this event in case people who see him on the plane think he is being extradited for IP offences, but his ears will be generally pointed in this event's direction. [read post]
