Search for: "People v. Liu"
Results 1 - 20
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 6:24 pm
Today the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm
Justice Liu writes a concurrence that, as usual, raises a variety of fascinating doctrinal points. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
Justice Liu authors this opinion, in which -- in 77 pages -- the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
No blood, no foul.But Justice Liu has a point as well. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:26 pm
Justice Liu instead dissents. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm
Read Justice Liu's concurring opinion in this one. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 7:07 am
The case is Li v Liu (page with full verdict here), […] [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
So is Justice Liu's. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
It is for the majority, but not for Justice Liu. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
One by Justice Liu, and one by Justice Evans. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 11:27 am
There's a majority opinion, and a concurrence by Justice Liu and a partial dissent by Justice Werdegar. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Regardless of what happens to you thereafter (and, as Justice Liu notes, one-third of people arrested for a felony don't ultimately get convicted of one). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 10:07 am
By way of a brief summary, in June, 2017, the Wuhan Intermediate People’s Court became the first Chinese court to recognize a U.S. judgment in the case of Liu Li v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:21 pm
The majority holds that when you enter a home, find a 76-year old woman baking cookies, and beat her to death with a tree limb, that counts as a "carjacking" as long as -- once she's dead -- you walk out of the kitchen, across a breezeway, enter a garage, and take the dead woman's car.Justices Werdegar and Liu don't agree. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:32 am
In Liu v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:12 am
Pakistan and SGS v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:59 pm
Or if you break into one apartment, rented by two people, and the door to each occupant's bedroom is locked with a padlock, since it's not really "shared" space, I can see why some people would want that to be two (rather than one) burglaries. [read post]
