Search for: "People v. Liu" Results 41 - 60 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Cunningham told Vice that Pack’s associates, Michael Horowitz and Karina Lantos Swett, had advised her and Liu “that if we wanted to make sure we stayed in CEO Pack’s good graces, that we needed to reorient our funds immediately” to support large-scale circumvention tools to help people in China bypass the Great Firewall. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
(June 22-June 25) On Monday, June 22, the Court teased us with a single decision: Liu v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am by Jeanne Huang
This is demonstrated by a reply issued by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court in 2006, which provides that judgments issued in Australia cannot be recognized and enforced in China because Australia has not offered reciprocity to Chinese judgments.[1] Liu v Ma & anor [2017] VSC 810 is the first Chinese monetary judgment recognized and enforced in the state of Victoria. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At NYU School of Law’s Compliance & Enforcement blog, Daniel Walfish looks at the “legal backdrop” of Liu v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:47 am by Rob Robinson
Wu Zhiyong, Wang Qian, Xu Ke, Liu Lei) PDF Wu_Zhiyong_Indictment_Final Selected Extracts from an article by Katie Benner in the New York Times U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court also described the award of damages – for an email sent to 16 people – as “manifestly excessive” and said no more than $25,000 would have been appropriate. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
On Friday, the justices added one case to their merits docket for the term: Liu v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am by Adeline Chong
In Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal was faced with an unusual clause: “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China and each of the parties hereto submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China. [read post]