Search for: "People v. Liu (1996)"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
So is Justice Liu's. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 pm
Beijing Science & Technology University (1999) (re-issued as guiding case #38) and Yang Baoxi v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 214. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Google’s problems in China, the controversy surrounding the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiao Bo and concerns about the use (or misuse) of defamation proceedings in some countries to silence political rivals or journalists show that freedom of speech issues are not bound by national borders. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:12 pm
$1.3 billion to $2.1 billion 1996-2004. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
Liu and John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
