Search for: "People v. Livingston"
Results 21 - 40
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 4:58 pm
Runyon (and 12 years ago in Dawson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:12 am
The case is Zuckerman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
The case is Khan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Since the company is exempt, the employees are denied overtime.The case is Hill v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:30 am
The courts don't like it when people up and leave their jobs and then sue for lost wages. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd [2015] UKSC 15 When the Court of Appeal held that a disability discrimination defence to possession under Equality Act 2010 had to face the same ‘seriously arguable’ summary test as an Article 8 defence, we were surprised, and very unimpressed. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
But many people can't get a lawyer, good or otherwise, because they can't afford one. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm
Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:34 am
Last September, the Circuit sent Chauca v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees.The case is Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 1:16 pm
The case is TW v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:50 am
He sues the district under the First Amendment.The case is Heller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
And as everyone knows, whether or not Mr Livingstone ought to be elected as Mayor of London was not a question upon which it could be said there was a right or a wrong answer which all right thinking people should give. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:28 am
The Court of Appeals says they cannot sue the police.The case is Crowell v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:57 am
New York Election Law contains all kinds of arcane provisions that people challenge in court. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:19 am
” Smith v. [read post]
