Search for: "People v. Lock" Results 121 - 140 of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
“We have the opportunity as a result of that to have a supermajority, even though...we may not even be in an absolute majority when it comes to the people who agree with us. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm by NARF
John Locke's theory of property, and the dispossession of Indigenous peoples in the settler-colony. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 6:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court in Security People, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
With possibly thousands of people prevented from voting in the 2010 General Election, can those who were locked out claim for compensation for breach of their human rights, and how much are they likely to receive? [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
  Monsters who prey on people, and people who just make one-time mistakes. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Perhaps there is a good reason to allow a disgraced Illinois pol lock in his choice as Senator under these circumstances. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am by Lorene Park
Let’s face it; romances between coworkers are more common than most people (particularly married people) want to admit. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Steve Hall
AMERICA locks up too many people for too many things for too long, largely due to the prevalence of mandatory-minimum sentencing laws. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 2:44 pm
 The fact that a California tribunal wouldn't have the power to change the ownership of the disputed property -- located (again) in Country X -- would seem to lock things down.Our fancy legal name for that is forum non conveniens. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:36 pm by Lincoln W. Hobbs, Esq., CCAL
"I think we can anticipate another appeal in a couple of years, at which time the court will review the credibility of Okelberrys' almost certain testimony that the locks were indeed put there to stop people, (rather than exceptionally intelligent Wasatch County livestock with opposable hooves), and Wasatch County's contention that that testimony is not credible. [read post]