Search for: "People v. Lockett" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”More than fifty years ago, in Miranda v Arizona, the US Supreme Court warned about the dangers inherent in private settings and circumstances which allow state officials to subjugate and intimidate people. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am by Jeff Welty
State, 747 N.E.2d 539 (Ind. 2001) (not unreasonable for an officer to ask a driver whether he had any weapons; “[t]he question was justified by police safety concerns”), with, e.g., People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:23 am by Steve Erickson
The obvious chief criticism that can be made against current Eight Amendment jurisprudence is the ambiguous nature of the "evolving standards of decency" established in Trop v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Sopkin, 488 F.3d 1262 (10th Cir. 2007) (dissented) “Skeptical of my own capacity to arrive purely by judicial self-direction at the optimal understanding of a complex corner of federal communications law”   Death Penalty The Estate of Lockett by & through Lockett v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:45 pm
Lockett’s vein had blown during his execution, and he writhed, clenched his teeth, and mumbled. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The rule is wrong for the reasons explained by Justice White in Lockett v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court left open the singular case of murders by life-sentenced inmates (which it closed 11 years later), but otherwise mitigation had to be considered.In 1978, the Supreme Court decided in Lockett v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:58 am by Russ Bensing
  Woodson‘s point was emphasized two years later in Lockett v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:33 am by Christy Unger
North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976) (mandatory death penalty statute is unconstitutional; Eighth Amendment requires individualized sentencing); Lockett v. [read post]