Search for: "People v. Lohr"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Bates quotes from [Lohr], which sets forth the presumption against preemption, without any indication of disapproval. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
From the precedent Farina cites (Lohr and Fellner, in addition to big block quotes from two of our favorites), you'd think it was an FDCA case.It wasn't. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
In the old (pre-Lohr) First Circuit case of Violette v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
The Lohr decision: FDA perspective and position. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), and with PMA devices currently. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) (repeating this holding in the context of the FDCA), and especially Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr). [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
We were too busy - and none of our clients would pay for it in any event - so we didn't attend yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Since we're always looking for things to blog about (and because of the identity of some of the people asking us) we're happy to oblige.The first problem is where to start. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the most on-point United States Supreme Court decision in the area. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
Prohias v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 496-97, 505-07 (1996); Hillsborough County v. [read post]
