Search for: "People v. Long Island Lighting Co" Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2021, 6:16 am by Jeanne Huang
  [1] High Court of Australia decisions such as Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418 at 445, Oceanic Sunline Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 at 259, Huddart Parker Ltd v The Ship Mill Hill (1950) 81 CLR 502 at 508-509. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Munsingwear in light of the election results. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
Resources Legal Cases Bobbs-Merrill Co. v Straus (Historic Case Re First-Sale Doctrine) UMG v Augusto (EFF Victory re First Sale and License Conditions) When is a ‘License’ Really a Sale? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
I realize that for some, these developments may seem a long time ago, with the assumptions underlying the covenants long past, although they are, of course, part of the historical underpinning of the claims of systemic racism today. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
”  That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
Kavanaugh wrote for a unanimous court, vacating board decisions in both Southern New England Telephone Co. v. [read post]