Search for: "People v. Lopez (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
In affirming the conviction, at People v McDaniel (_ NY3d_, 2009 NY Slip Op 06369 [9/1/09]), the Court of Appeals held that Because defense counsel's decision not to seek dismissal of the robbery in the first degree charge for insufficient evidence would not have resulted in a dismissal of that charge (see People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 219-220 [1989]; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 380-381 [1983]), defendant's claim… [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:08 pm by Mark Bennett
 Shout it from the rooftops: Carlos DeLuna, executed in Texas for the 1983 murder of Wanda Lopez. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
Axcan Scandipharm, Inc., 2006 WL 456173 (W.D.Pa. 2006), lv. to app. den. 2006 WL 986971(W.D.Pa. 2006), Fifth Circuit: Lopez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm by Ken White
Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006), Lee v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm by Ken White
Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006), Lee v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
y it matters in light of a concurrently running longer sentence U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 Lopez-Quinones v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
” He alleges it did nothing of the sort, and also contained an ingredient, yohimbe, that is dangerous for some people. [read post]