Search for: "People v. Mann" Results 101 - 120 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Fran Unsworth told Mr Justice Mann at a High Court trial in London that the BBC had a responsibility to report but also to be sensitive. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 am by INFORRM
  He said: “If there was the possibility of an interview, we would have needed to be in the appropriate place to do it, which is why we deployed people there. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by INFORRM
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The second day of the trial in the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC took place yesterday before Mr Justice Mann. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s opinion analysis comes from Ronald Mann. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For this blog, Ronald Mann analyzes the court’s opinion this week in Patchak v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Mann J continues to manage both the News Group and the Mirror Group phone hacking litigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes that argument for this blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Brighton’s Argus newspaper breached the Editors’ Code with a story which claimed the local council evicted homeless people from tents on New Year’s Day. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
[Updated] On 26 May 2017 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Sir Cliff Richard OBE v. [read post]