Search for: "People v. Manners"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
A trial court may consider "(1) the device's capability for recording and general reliability; (2) competency of the operator; (3) proper operation of the device; (4) showing the manner in which the recording was preserved; (5) identification of the persons, locale, or objects depicted; (6) explanation of any copying or duplicating process. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
Stamm, how can law enforcement pull people over suspected of DUI and demand a blood sample. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
More for its style rather than its substance (though I think the latter is fine as well).But, as to the former, I like it how Justice Huffman slams -- fairly forcefully -- the various arguments of "the People" (e.g., the deputy AG's) on appeal in a manner that makes it clear that he expects more from the AG's office than existed here and yet avoids being offensive. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:41 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:03 pm
His citation of Clark v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:49 pm
George & Fee Simple, Life Estate, and Remainders] Class #9: Time Place & Manner Regulations and Obscenity I Ward v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Lee v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:27 am
(Orin Kerr) I recently taught one of my favorite criminal law cases, People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
.' The question before us is whether trial courts are vested with discretion to decide whether a judge is available under section 1538.5(p), and if so, what limitations constrain that discretion.What we hold is that although trial courts possess broad discretion to distribute business within their courts and make determinations concerning the availability of judges, that discretion must be exercised in a manner consistent with constraints imposed by section 1538.5(p). [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
In the case of People v Scott, 63 NY2d 518 [1984], the criminal court held that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
There are undoubtedly people who are far more familiar with rap lyrics than I am. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:10 pm
In my experience, defenders of liability in Snyder v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
History Through the Eyes of Everyday People. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Indeed, we should ticket people for violating these rules more than we do, IMHO.But what about using your smartphone to surf the internet? [read post]
