Search for: "People v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 8,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm
Notably, the US argues that limiting registration of disparaging marks in Tam was more suspect because it was directed toward a particular viewpoint (e.g., disparagement of people …). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:08 pm
Facebook TMs lots of LIKE marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Hells Angels pick fight with Amazon.com (over trademark infringement) Frustrated Trademark Attorney Examines Frustrated Marks Geekview IP Week in Review [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
The relevant public was composed by German-speaking consumers in the EU and thus included people who might have never seen or heard of the movie. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
Alas, Brigadier General Mark Martins, now the chief prosecutor of the military commissions, can’t blog for Lawfare any more, as he did when he was in the field in Afghanistan. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
The problem is that if it wasn’t orange people wouldn’t buy it. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
BA284590, Mark V. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:48 pm
I just listened to the State of Maine v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:25 am
Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins gave the following statement to the press this morning: Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins Remarks at Guantanamo Bay 6 May 2012 Good morning. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 pm
For those countries that have not adopted service marks, marks of political parties are filed in classes 9 and 16 for the usual reasons.Getting back to UKIP, the illustrations above are those of successful lions (Lonsdale v Puhin Deng* and ING v Daniel Cekal) who have protected their market share or hunting grounds, so to speak, based in similarity. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:01 pm
Mark L. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:06 am
UPDATE: Mark Bennett points out two other good ones: Kaiser Law Blog (a new one to me) and People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
Article 8 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Trial of Administrative Cases involving Trademark Authorization and Confirmation (Interpretation No. 2 [2017] of the Supreme People’s Court) suggests that: When the disputed trade mark is a foreign language sign, the People's Court shall judge whether the foreign-language trade mark possesses distinctiveness based on the general knowledge… [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:32 am
Of the briefs filed in Lee v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:09 am
SUISSE as a variant of the certification mark SWISS for the same goods, and so it affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: The SWISS certification mark registration survived a challenge in 2012 on five grounds, including genericness, in Swiss Watch International, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
Texas Data v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:45 am
Here is why.Only one issue might be on appeal at the Zhejiang Higher People's Court --the 20 million Yuan in damages for Plaintiff. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
We don't want delusional people defending themselves. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Over at Defending People, blogger and criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett has been carrying on a discussion with his readers about legal ethics. [read post]
