Search for: "People v. Marks (1986)" Results 81 - 100 of 300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Maryland, supra (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The jiplp weblog carries a crisp, clear account by Peter Jabaly of the US decision in Air-Freshner v Paul Getty and the limited utility of fair use defences in trade mark infringement proceedings. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
Because the term is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, it is ambiguous (see Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570, 573 [1986]). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“The time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of The Supreme Court,” a young professor of law at the University of Wisconsin named Mark V. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Apodaca, 726 P.2d 565 (Ariz. 1986), did “not believe that the concept of punitive damages should be stretched. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:05 am by Steve Hall
  The 1986 Supreme Court ruling referenced in the column is Ford v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
As we made clear in Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. [read post]