Search for: "People v. Marks (1988)"
Results 21 - 40
of 325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 43 (1988). [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:28 am
Cir. 1988)). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
IP: the "no-patents round-up for non-techie people" -- today's conference organised by CLT and hosted in London's Grange Fitzrovia Hotel -- was opened by James Tumbridge (Pillsbury), speaking on trade mark and trade dress protection. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:57 pm
Rev. 17, 22–24 (1988), HeinOnline. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
It doesn’t ban speech (since people remain free to use even unregistered marks). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
Some people don’t learn. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
A few people have asked me to take a look at the case, wondering if it's as crazy and extreme as some (okay, Slate's Mark Stern) say. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 12:40 pm
Mark v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:25 pm
Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1181 (9th Cir. 1988); Big Island Candies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Johnson, Mark Dean, ed. [read post]
