Search for: "People v. Martin (2000)"
Results 1 - 20
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
The court built on its prior decision in Martin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
Martin Griffiths, on 5 January 2024[8] and the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
May 4, 2010) (concluding that a defendant's characterization of a plaintiff as racist "is a subjective assertion, not sufficiently susceptible to being proved true or false to constitute defamation"); Martin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
His lecture will be preceded by an introductory talk and tour of the church by John Martin. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
And by the way, we agree with Will Baude that it's hard to see how people ever have standing to sue for nominal damages. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
App. 4th 1165, 1180 (2000). [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts § 578 cmt. e; see also Martin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
App. 4th 1165, 1180 (2000). [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts § 578 cmt. e; see also Martin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
Miller, Jr. (2000) 0-7388-3464-5 Xlibris Corp. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Conundrum follows--yet most participants in the chattering about this remain blissfully oblivious to the analytics of that conundrum.It ought to surprise few people, then, that in this anarchic and dynamic environment, the concept of value maximization, its meaning, and its relevance remains hotly contested, sometimes as part of the debate about corporate purpose (see Brief Thoughts on Martin Lipton: "ESG, Stakeholder Governance, and the Duty of the Corporation"… [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:23 am
Schwartz, Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
In 2000, the corporate income tax (CIT) rate was 9.5 percent and the individual income tax rate was 5.85 percent. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
…Church treasures are articles of particular (or special) historic, architectural, archaeological or artistic interest falling within the faculty jurisdiction: see rule 15(1)(a) of the FJR 2000 (now rule 8.6(1)(c) of the FJR 2013). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
In re Chmura, 608 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. 2000); State v. [read post]
