Search for: "People v. Martinez (1984)"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm
ShareIt has been nearly 40 years since the Supreme Court indicated in Chevron v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
Vila (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 76, 85; People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984), has come to be understood and applied. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:17 am
In 2012, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 majority landmark decision (one hotly contested by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia) in Martinez v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Martinez, 561 U.S. 661, 680 (2010). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Martinez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Five to eight people were walking away from the area in various directions in a field between buildings and other people were standing closer to the buildings. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Dec. 3, 2018); Martinez Torres v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
Kyles V. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
In 2013, Johnson filed a motion asking the district court to reconsider its previous dismissal based on Martinez v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
Indeed, that is why all witnesses—lay or expert—are called: to get what they know about the case that other people do not. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
First among them, of course, is marginally faster access to relist information, which is what I assume people mean when they mention “Big Data. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
