Search for: "People v. Marx"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Other important philosophic figures appear only once or twice in Canadian case law, giving their authority to specific matters facing the court, such as: imprecise language (Confucius); secular involvement in religious disputes (Maimonides); and the suitability of individuals to be called to the bar (Karl Marx). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Some examples include (i) guiding people who are visually impaired, (ii) pulling a wheelchair, (iii) alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, (iv) retrieving dropped items, (v) alerting hearing-impaired people to the presence of people, sounds, and hazards, and (vi) reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications. [read post]
24 May 2016, 7:56 pm
The object is not merely to maximize the welfare of the funds’ ultimate investors, the people of Norway (through its state apparatus), but also to use the fund to advance Norwegian public policy in the international sphere and within the domestic legal systems of other states to achieve a measure of horizontal harmonization of corporate governance. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Every year, my distinguished colleague at Penn State, Jan M. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:55 am
Fletcher (known as Buddy) was in a long-term relationship with Hobart V. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:49 pm
Supreme Court in Seattle Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
His stride is reminiscent of Groucho Marx, and he walks at the roughly the pace where most people are about to break into a run. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Marx, Gary T. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Business and human rights: Governance challenges in an era of transition Panellists include Professor Lorna McGregor (University of Essex), Professor Morris Altman (University of Dundee), Dr Axel Marx (University of Leuven), Professor Brigit Toebes (University of Groningen) and Dr Gale Raj-Reichert (Bard College Berlin). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
" [28] The remedy for violation of a non-compete agreement is either damages or an injunction. [29] Additionally, new employers may be held liable for hiring an employee who has signed a non-compete agreement with another employer. [30] V. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
What we now face is the contradiction between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people’s ever-growing needs for a better life. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
What we now face is the contradiction between unbalanced and inadequate development and the people’s ever-growing needs for a better life. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Over lunch, Egilman explained to me that he considered himself a Marxist-Leninist, his term, and that the day would come when people like him would have to kill people like me, again his language. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
