Search for: "People v. Matz"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 10:59 am
Joshua Matz is of counsel at Gupta Wessler PLLC and Kaplan & Company LLP. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
This episode was produced by Melody Rowell and engineered by the National Constitution Center's A/V team. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:57 am
But, as Matz already knows, the Michigan Court of Appeals in Woll v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:37 am
“People ask, ‘Why did you pick constitutional law? [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 11:18 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
” The Coronavirus is Testing America’s Commitment to People’s Constitutional Rights By Joshua Matz, Attorney and Author Joshua Matz writes that the federal government cannot forego constitutional rights for prisoners in the midst of the pandemic, and instead must take specific steps to save the lives of detainees at risk of getting COVID-19. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
Last year, in Agency for International Development v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:18 am
Matz and Pietsch, and a growing bandwagon of other attorneys, were sending lawyer solicitation letters to people who had just been injured in automobile accidents. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
And of a more recent vintage, we cover a collection of Trump-inspired works, including books by Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe and Joshua Matz, Alan Dershowitz, and Frank O. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:35 am
” At Take Care, Joshua Matz “address[es] three of the most common arguments against protecting transgender people under Title VII” in the latest of a series of posts about a case next term that presents the question. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
McKellar, the MoFo Client Alert discusses the matter of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:47 am
At Take Care, Joshua Matz argues that “[i]t’s hardly obvious that DOJ should rush to the Supreme Court this time around,” and observes that “at every turn, even when doing so requires reading precedent or judicial orders with a miserly eye, this administration seems obsessed with excluding as many people as possible for as long as possible. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
' Is the principle of state sovereignty challenged not only by a single people, but also by international organizations? [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Simon Stern The government’s motion to dismiss in CREW v. [read post]
