Search for: "People v. May (1989)" Results 101 - 120 of 1,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Moreover, Americans were good evangelists, attempting to spread that faith when, especially after 1989, many American professors were asked to “consult” with new groups of would-be “framers” in a variety of countries. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
It has been hailed as one of the most important civil-rights decisions for people with disabilities. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am by Guangjian Tu
But a court may not devise novel rules to favor arbitration over litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Stephen Halbrook
" The government may not limit that right to a privileged class. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
“The [Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage] Act does not require an equal division of marital property, but an equitable division” In re Marriage of Jones, 543 NE 2d 119 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1989 Unless the parties work together in the business and agree to continue working together, the business will not be divided between the parties. [read post]