Search for: "People v. Mayor" Results 21 - 40 of 1,004
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am by Adam Wagner
Hall & Ors v Mayor of London (On Behalf of the Greater London Authority) [2010] EWCA Civ 817 (16 July 2010) – read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliament Square, with the Court of Appeal upholding a decision of the High Court stating that the Mayor’s response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:55 am by boston
The Supreme Court made that clear back in 1943 in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:24 pm
First, after dropping the bombshell on Mayor Villaraigosa, the Court of Appeal modified this opinion. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by David Smith
The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) You may remember that there has been some previous litigation (the most crucial of which we reported on here) between the Mayor of London and various persons protesting on or around Parliament Square. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:48 pm by Michael Froomkin
” We need, he said, housing for people who are working here, people starting families. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:55 am
The only solution will be a public outcry that even Mayor Bloomberg will hear. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Colin Miller, one of my favorite bloggers on evidence, addresses a best evidence issue raised in People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 5:41 am by SHG
” Never one to let law or constitutional rights get in the way of some feelz of his own: It has been legal for women to go topless in New York since 1992, when the state’s Court of Appeals ruled in People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When the money people challenged these restrictions under the First Amendment (on the theory that campaign contributions and spending constitutes political speech), the Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]