Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 61 - 80 of 43,816
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
Recent Developments On 8 May 2024, the House of Commons Library issued Intimidation of candidates and voters (“the Briefing”), which summarizes recent developments. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
Although some protestors may argue that camping is protected symbolic expression, a Supreme Court decision from 1982, Clark v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, there are also many illegitimate reasons that an employer may end an employment relationship. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, there are also many illegitimate reasons that an employer may end an employment relationship. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]