Search for: "People v. Mays (1998)" Results 161 - 180 of 2,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
This decision may seem at odds with the decision in Uber BV and others v Aslam and others [2021] UKSC 5, in which Uber drivers were found to be workers rather than self-employed. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Strasbourg may need to clarify its decision in Colon and its implications for Gillan. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
Gang-related violence is often connected to drug-dealing, and may also involve firearms offences, obstruction of justice and other illegal activity which threatens public safety and the rule of law. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Also, on 20 May 1998, the defendant appeared with counsel. [read post]