Search for: "People v. McCormick" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in contemporary… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Priya Huskins, Esq., Senior Vice President at Woodruff Sawyer, takes a detailed look at Chancellor McCormick’s opinion and considers the opinion’s practical implications. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:13 am by Frank Cranmer
Glasgow is well known as a city which is friendly to all people, but particularly including people from the LGBTQ and Muslim communities. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by Matthew Dochnal
Chancellor Kathleen McCormick, the head of the Chancery Court, presides over the Twitter v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
  Because politicians both seek money from constituents and in the normal course of their business do things for them, McCormick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent B.C. decision in McCormick v Plambec applied this test in a different factual context, and also concluded that liability should not attach to the social host. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 2:57 pm by Francis Pileggi
’s. founder filed against directors and shareholders who allegedly conspired to seize control, finding a boardroom rival’s opposition to his management decisions did not constitute disloyalty or a civil conspiracy in O’Gara, et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, requiring that bribery or kickbacks were necessary for honest services fraud; McCormick v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
  A case decided yesterday by the California Court of Appeal, People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:12 am by Marcie Mangan
The law, as set forth by the First District in this case, will continue to keep people safe,” Plaintiff’s attorney Patrick A. [read post]