Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 201 - 220
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Heymann: This is tied to TM as source indicator v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
Beebe: search costs v. information costs—what is the distinction between those? [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
Inwood v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
Mark McKenna Secondary trademark liability rules don’t necessarily derive from the common law of torts. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Sheff: McKenna’s work on brand extensions complicates the contagion story—some extensions don’t work. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Judge Tjoflat in Floride Norelus v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Most people are better at problem-solving; few are proficient at both. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
See Kam Lee Yuen Trading Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Elan turned to McKenna Long partner R. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 4:45 am
In DiFolco v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:29 am
I was reminded of this when reading about McKenna v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:48 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, lawprof Orin Kerr posts about the 6th Circuit decision in McKenna v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
McKenna v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am
Mark McKenna: Work for hire idea depends on the idea that people who are authors by operation of law, like Disney, are going to view themselves as owners rather than creators. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
