Search for: "People v. McKenna"
Results 221 - 240
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm
From medical files that I have reviewed recently it seems that once experts have identified that there are toxic substances in a particular neighborhood or environment, people come forward with a long list of complaints and medical histories alleging that the exposure caused some, most or all of the illnesses. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Lemley, Stanford Law School: co-authored paper with Mark McKenna. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
"This was the best continuing legal education I've had in 17 years," attorney Don McKenna told me. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Phillip Carter is an associate in McKenna Long & Aldridge's Los Angeles Office, where he is a member of the Government Contracts practice group. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Affecting TM law (as set forth in new paper with Mark McKenna, which is excellent). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
(I think this claim makes Mark McKenna’s point quite well: TM’s key wrong turn came when it abandoned competition. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Grow - http://tinyurl.com/3dk9rmo (Cas Purdy) Deloitte Global Corporate Counsel Report 2011 - http://tinyurl.com/3gbdrc4 (Registration Required) (Deloitte) eDiscovery Basics: Litigation Preparedness (Vol. 1, No. 3) http://tinyurl.com/4xfffbz (Gibson Dunn) June Edition of Corporate Counsel Magazine - Online - http://tinyurl.com/3efpac7 (ALM) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 1 - http://tinyurl.com/3ojftdf (Kayleigh Roberts, Ashley Trent) SuperConference 2011 Session Highlights: Day 2 -… [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
