Search for: "People v. McKenzie"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
He actually said : Regular ill-informed and deliberately partial press commentary must have an impact on the public at large but targeted so-called advice by some semi-professional McKenzie Friends or other lay organisations to vulnerable individuals who find themselves the subject of care proceedings, has the effect in some cases of moving those individuals directly away from engaging effectively in the court process and achieving access to the system, which I believe would respect their… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Interestingly, the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Fulford LJ and Leggatt J) permitted a McKenzie Friend, Dr Michael Pelling, to make representations on his behalf. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
I think paid McKenzie friends introduces a prospect of having yet another part of a professional who is coming in to help litigants;” “One has to bear in mind, and I have seen this both in crime and in immigration……I have seen them, who give legal advice that is simply wrong and you are preying on vulnerable people and that is why I am very, very cautious about payment to non- lawyers who try and assist vulnerable people. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:22 pm
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
Three-quarters of people believe victims of “revenge porn” should be given anonymity to bring the offence in line with other sexual crimes. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 am
The set up in McKenzie v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
We could not just rock up at court and advise people. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 12:56 pm
The company said it would perform a demonstration, but only to people with badges, according to supervisor Joe Simitian. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
It worries me that people swallow what they read without checking the sources. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Outside of my firm, one of the guys who held that position was Bill Outman of Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Annabelle now writes to let us know that she has put online the various videos of each presentation, for those people who could not attend the seminar. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:59 am
“There were all sorts of really qualified people who were available as possibilities. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
This should scare a lot of people into thinking about corporate compliance. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am
However, he determined that McIntosh's PTSD was not compensable because her PTSD was not "the natural or unavoidable result" of her minor physical injury under section 440.093(2).McIntosh appealed and the 1st DCA reversed the JCC.Citing McKenzie v. [read post]
