Search for: "People v. McKenzie"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
European Union: “Politics for People: Demanding Transparent and Ethical Lobbying in the EU” by Jessica McKenzie in TechPresident. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:27 am
Mckenzie Ripoff Report May Be “Appalling,” But It Still Gets 47 USC 230 Immunity–Giordano v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:10 pm
Estate of Huston v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
What would surprise people most about you? [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Speakers are Ben Allgrove, a partner in the London office of Baker & McKenzie LLP which is kindly hosting the event, and JIPLP editorial board member Gert Wuertenberger (Wuertenberger Kunze, Munich). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm
Mary's Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
Platsas, University of Derby (England) · A Romanian Epistemology of Legal Transplant: The Theory of ”Forms without Substance” Manuel Gutan, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (Romania) · Expanding Legal Geographies: A Call for a Critical Comparative Approach, Alexandre Kedar, University of Haifa (Israel) IV.B Mixed Jurisdictions in… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Flagship urls are all very well, said Robert, and can be highly memorable -- but the days of people typing them in full into their browsers are over and SEO can be expensive and its results unpredictable. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:16 am
McKenzie v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:15 am
They assist litigants-in-person and their role derives originally from the case of McKenzie v McKenzie [1971] P33. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am
But from this week in Scottish courts, people helping them with their cases, who are known as McKenzie friends, will be granted the right to speak for them. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
I’m don’t want to beat up Napo over this, particularly since the three very nice Napo people who took the trouble to travel to meet with me were plainly well intentioned and hard working practitioners with a wealth of experience in the field and who struck me as appropriately concerned, and anxious to turn this into a learning experience. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
See Flaskamp v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) (glass in piece of cake); McKenzie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
In Moreau v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
I gather that Diane Abbott, after Ed Miliband gave her a ‘dressing down’, then remarked on the tendency for London cabbies to drive past black people. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) and McKenzie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:29 am
Whether or not Dr Pelling has appeared in those programmes, I do not know, but he is (I gather) a professional McKenzie friend in certain proceedings. [read post]
