Search for: "People v. McNamara" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Legal Beagle
But from this week in Scottish courts, people helping them with their cases, who are known as McKenzie friends, will be granted the right to speak for them. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
The case of Tods Murray v Arakin and Mr McNamara’s position as a “Vexatious Litigant” featured in the Sunday Herald :  A-courting we will go ... [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by stevehansen
  As many people predicted, Facebook also alleged patent infringement claims against Yahoo based on 10 of Facebook’s patents. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm by Adam Wagner
As I did with the Bill of Rights Commission consultation, I asked people to send me their consultation responses. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:12 am by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       The National Organization for Rare Disorders (“NORD”) announced the submission of a Citizen Petition to FDA  requesting “that a documented policy be established regarding the review of potential treatments for people with rare diseases. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:22 am by Louis Rosen
  He defended penniless petty criminals, notorious Chicago gangsters, controversial labor leaders like Eugene V. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm by Daniel Reid
 The Court noted that financial problems were the most common motives alleged and accepted for people to commit arson of their own property, citing Abmrus v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am by Liz Campbell
However, the Circuit Court decision in People (DPP) v Kelly is relevant. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]