Search for: "People v. Meis" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am by Larry
In a discussion on the interpretation of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, Judge Restani mentioned her recent decision in Blue Sky the Color of Imagination, LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132  (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
30 May 2009, 1:30 am
I spoke to Frank Vargo, one of their trade experts, who is very frustrated that some people are convinced that free trade agreements cause the loss of U.S. jobs. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP)   Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques)   Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in… [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm by IP Dragon
.- (IV) Examination and cooperation- (V) Industry cooperation, in the patent and trademark industries.- (VI) Authentication Service; copyrighted works needed to be first certified in Hong Kong. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
The system has also been criticised by UN human rights and poverty rapporteur Philip Alston who told the court by letter that it appears to discriminate against people with little money and people with a minority background. . . [read post]