Search for: "People v. Melendez" Results 101 - 120 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2009, 3:16 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:14 am
  This past summer, in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
  Such “notice and demand” statutes received approval by the US Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
  You can get a copy of the National Innocence Project’s amicus brief in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
That's the title of a report in today's Washington Post on the aftermath of the Supreme Court's ruling in  Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:36 am
For some counties, round trip is going to be 10 to 12 hours to testify" for the lab analyst to travel to court.Burns said 42 states and the District are affected by the Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
  Beginning with Scalia's earth shattering Crawford decision in 2004 and culminating, at least for the moment, in this term's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:22 pm
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
(The same atypical voting pattern came in last week's Confrontation Clause case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
The court issued its rulings this morning.A big win in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
Unfortunately for Melendez-Diaz, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had already squarely addressed this issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]