Search for: "People v. Mendoza (1998)"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 3:52 pm
Recently, in People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Mendoza (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1114, 1135; see Cal. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:22 am
People v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:31 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Mendoza v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
Grimes, 621 A.2d 211, 213-14 (Vt. 1992); Mendoza v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
In Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza, which Lord Phillips described as the “definitive” case on s.3 HRA 1998, the House of Lords held that s.3 could permit a Court to depart from a provision whose meaning was unambiguous, if that provision was not ECHR compatible, with the dramatic implication that s.3 could oblige a Court to disregard the legislative purpose of subsequent Parliaments. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
Mendoza, 438 F.3d 792, 795 (7th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. [read post]
