Search for: "People v. Merriam" Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am by Terry Hart
One of the most relevant and thorough is US v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  Let them take arms.3 Even Noah Webster, of Merriam-Webster (yes, the dictionary) fame, said, Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:34 pm by admin
In 1984, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 5:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
This is one of those words that people pronounce a lot of different ways. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am by Russell Knight
When people get married, they join their lives…at least on an ongoing basis. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Travis Casey
  Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:56 pm by Michael Grossman
Homeopathy is defined by Merriam-Webster as: “A system for treating illnesses that uses very small amounts of substances that would in larger amounts produce symptoms of the illnesses in healthy people. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by SHG
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 am by imlablog
Courtesy http://www.change.org/photos/wordpress_copies/cow.jpg Posted By: Dwight Merriam, Partner, Robinson & Cole, LLP A couple of weeks ago, the South Dakota Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
 Almost as many people viewed this spectacle online and in the non-British press as viewed the late Neil Armstrong's moonwalk, but the British press was asked to refrain from publishing the pics. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
"Incorrigible" is defined as a person who is "incapable of being corrected, not reformable" (Merriam-Webster) and, thus this term is completely out of line with the current understanding of the goals of our Family Court system. [read post]