Search for: "People v. Miller"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 10:52 am
City of Kalispell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
FL High Court to Hear Case Involving Juvenile Life Sentences: A Florida woman convicted of murder when she was 15-years-old and sentenced to life in prison is asking the Florida Supreme Court to be re-sentenced under the US Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Florida and Miller v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
UMG v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:54 am
Thus, "candor requires the admission that our past decisions have lacked a precise consistency" (Miller v Miller, 22 NY2d 12, 15). [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:53 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Miller v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm
CFP: ClassCrits V November 16-17, 2012 CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION ClassCrits V From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream Sponsored by University of Wisconsin Law School & The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School Madison, WI. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:55 am
A tactic more people should try. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:47 am
I’ll be discussing tips to increase the value of car accident cases with McCormick’s new requirements, important developments in No-Fault benefits, insurance adjuster issues, as well as some key new cases, such as Miller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
Miller, 2011-Ohio-3600 (10th Dist.) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
In 2012, in a case called Miller v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 6:34 am
Joe Miller at the Fire of Genius blog (see below) stated that the opinion contained "some of the harshest language I recall seeing in a Supreme Court oral argument. [read post]
