Search for: "People v. Miller"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
” (Last quoting Jensen v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
about the "kill zone" theory in the recent case of People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Supreme Court decided in Miller v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
” Adding to the old adage of people, process and tech is a smart move. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
In 2012, in a case called Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:48 am
Vogt of Law 360 reports that the court will be deciding if its earlier rulings in Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Gobitis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
The House of Commons exists because the people have elected its members. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:41 pm
DOT v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
